Instead, we'll initialize the buffer just enough so that renderers
can work with it and if the dmabuf import was successful, we continue
initializing the buffer. This will allow the dmabuf texture to addon
itself onto the buffer for further use without another import.
This abstraction is incompatible with wlr_raster in every way, let's just
use the client submitted buffers directly. This will regress a couple
of things until wlr_raster has been fully integrated.
This lets the renderer handle the wlr_buffer directly, just like it
does in texture_from_buffer. This also allows the renderer to batch
the rectangle updates, and update more than the damage region if
desirable (e.g. too many rects), so can be more efficient.
When using direct scanout back_buffer is NULL. We'd emit a commit
event with WLR_OUTPUT_STATE_BUFFER set but with a NULL buffer field,
which is non-sensical.
wl_subsurface description states:
A sub-surface becomes mapped, when a non-NULL wl_buffer is applied and
the parent surface is mapped.
Note that this doesn't require an explicit commit, which means that a
newly created subsurface with a mapped parent and a buffer already
attached must be mapped immediately. This can happen with the following
sequence of events:
- subcompositor.get_subsurface(subsurface, surface, parent)
- surface.attach(buffer)
- surface.commit()
- subsurface.destroy()
- subcompositor.get_subsurface(subsurface, surface, parent)
Fixes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wlroots/wlroots/-/issues/3449
The previous wlr_output_cursor_set_image() allows setting a NULL buffer for the
cursor to hide it. This functionality was used by sway to hide the cursor,
restore the original semantics by allowing NULL buffers again by avoiding the
wlr_buffer allocation in case we have NULL pixels and handing a NULL wlr_buffer
to wlr_output_cursor_set_buffer().
Whether a texture is opaque or not doesn't depend on the renderer
at all, it just depends on the source buffer. Instead of forcing
all renderers to implement wlr_texture_impl.is_opaque, let's move
this in common code and use the wlr_buffer format to know whether
a texture will be opaque.
...in wlr_scene_layer_surface_v1_configure()
Reproduce bug with waybar by setting `"margin": 5,`
in ~/.config/waybar/config. It will result in the right edge of the panel
extending outside the edge of the output.
The bug can also be reproduced with gtk-layer-demo by anchoring
left/right/top/bottom and setting respective margins
Relates-to: https://github.com/labwc/labwc/issues/382
Before calling wlr_output_impl.{test,commit}, perform a cheap
comparison between the current and candidate state. Unset any
fields which didn't change.
This refactors output_ensure_buffer() to not mutate the state passed,
making the previous subtle behavior much more explicit.
Fixes: d483dd2f ("output: add wlr_output_commit_state")
Closes: #3442
Replace them with wlr_signal_emit_safe, which correctly handles
cases where a listener removes another listener.
Reported-by: Isaac Freund <ifreund@ifreund.xyz>
See the discussion at [1]: there's no easy way to fix libwayland-cursor
without a new API. Sending the error for other roles will prevent the
same client bug from appearing elsewhere.
[1]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland/-/issues/194
This commit ensures that outputs that weren't created by the output
layout helper aren't destroyed on the output layout change.
Consider the following piece of logic:
// struct wlr_output *o1, *o2;
// struct wlr_scene *scene;
// struct wlr_output_layout *layout;
wlr_scene_attach_output_layout(scene, layout);
wlr_output_layout_add_auto(layout, o1);
struct wlr_scene_output *so2 = wlr_scene_output_create(scene, o2);
wlr_output_layout_move(layout, o1, 100, 200);
// so2 is invalid now