mirror of
				https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland.git
				synced 2025-10-29 05:40:16 -04:00 
			
		
		
		
	contributing: about re-sending patches
This is what is generally expected from people who re-send patches, whether the patches are their own or not. Signed-off-by: Pekka Paalanen <pekka.paalanen@collabora.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com> Reviewed-by: Derek Foreman <derek.foreman.samsung@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									3cfdd56af4
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						9f80af930b
					
				
					 1 changed files with 8 additions and 0 deletions
				
			
		|  | @ -43,6 +43,14 @@ responsibility for the copyright status of the code. | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
| We won't reject patches that lack S-o-b, but it is strongly recommended. | We won't reject patches that lack S-o-b, but it is strongly recommended. | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
|  | When you re-send patches, revised or not, it would be very good to document the | ||||||
|  | changes compared to the previous revision in the commit message and/or the | ||||||
|  | cover letter. If you have already received Reviewed-by or Acked-by tags, you | ||||||
|  | should evaluate whether they still apply and include them in the respective | ||||||
|  | commit messages. Otherwise the tags may be lost, reviewers miss the credit they | ||||||
|  | deserve, and the patches may cause redundant review effort. | ||||||
|  | 
 | ||||||
|  | 
 | ||||||
| Tracking patches and following up | Tracking patches and following up | ||||||
| --------------------------------- | --------------------------------- | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
|  |  | ||||||
		Loading…
	
	Add table
		Add a link
		
	
		Reference in a new issue
	
	 Pekka Paalanen
						Pekka Paalanen