mirror of
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland.git
synced 2025-10-29 05:40:16 -04:00
contributing: about re-sending patches
This is what is generally expected from people who re-send patches, whether the patches are their own or not. Signed-off-by: Pekka Paalanen <pekka.paalanen@collabora.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com> Reviewed-by: Derek Foreman <derek.foreman.samsung@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
3cfdd56af4
commit
9f80af930b
1 changed files with 8 additions and 0 deletions
|
|
@ -43,6 +43,14 @@ responsibility for the copyright status of the code.
|
|||
|
||||
We won't reject patches that lack S-o-b, but it is strongly recommended.
|
||||
|
||||
When you re-send patches, revised or not, it would be very good to document the
|
||||
changes compared to the previous revision in the commit message and/or the
|
||||
cover letter. If you have already received Reviewed-by or Acked-by tags, you
|
||||
should evaluate whether they still apply and include them in the respective
|
||||
commit messages. Otherwise the tags may be lost, reviewers miss the credit they
|
||||
deserve, and the patches may cause redundant review effort.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Tracking patches and following up
|
||||
---------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue