mirror of
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland.git
synced 2025-10-29 05:40:16 -04:00
protocol: add sub-surfaces to the core
The sub-surface protocol was originally committed into Weston on May 10th, 2013, in commit 2396aec6842c709a714f3825dbad9fd88478f2e6. The design for the protocol had started in the beginning of December 2012. I think it is high time to move this into the core now. This patch copies the sub-surface protocol as it was in Weston on Nov 15th, 2013, into Wayland. Weston gets a patch to remove the protocol from there. Sub-surface is a wl_surface role. You create a wl_surface as usual, and assign it the sub-surface role and a parent wl_surface. Sub-surfaces are an integral part of the parent surface, and stay glued to the parent. For window management, a window is the union of the top-level wl_surface and all its sub-surfaces. Sub-surfaces are not clipped to the parent, and the union of the surface tree can be larger than the (top-level) wl_surface at its root. The representative use case for sub-surfaces is a video player window. When the video content is given its own wl_surface, there is no need to modify the video frame contents after decoding or copy them into a whole window sized buffer before submitting it to the compositor. This allows efficient, zero-copy video presentation paths, where video decoding hardware produces a (YUV) buffer, which eventually ends up in a (YUV-capable) hardware overlay and is scanned out directly. This can also be used for zero-copy presentation of windowed OpenGL content, where the OpenGL rendering engine does not need to draw or avoid window decorations. Sub-surfaces allow mixing different buffer types into the same window, e.g. software-rendered decorations in wl_shm buffers, and live content in EGL-based buffers. However, the sub-surface extension does not offer clipping or scaling facilities, or accurate presentation timing. Those are topics for additional extensions. Signed-off-by: Pekka Paalanen <pekka.paalanen@collabora.co.uk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
4a196570a3
commit
81c57614d1
1 changed files with 217 additions and 0 deletions
|
|
@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
|
|||
<copyright>
|
||||
Copyright © 2008-2011 Kristian Høgsberg
|
||||
Copyright © 2010-2011 Intel Corporation
|
||||
Copyright © 2012-2013 Collabora, Ltd.
|
||||
|
||||
Permission to use, copy, modify, distribute, and sell this
|
||||
software and its documentation for any purpose is hereby granted
|
||||
|
|
@ -1795,4 +1796,220 @@
|
|||
|
||||
</interface>
|
||||
|
||||
<interface name="wl_subcompositor" version="1">
|
||||
<description summary="sub-surface compositing">
|
||||
The global interface exposing sub-surface compositing capabilities.
|
||||
A wl_surface, that has sub-surfaces associated, is called the
|
||||
parent surface. Sub-surfaces can be arbitrarily nested and create
|
||||
a tree of sub-surfaces.
|
||||
|
||||
The root surface in a tree of sub-surfaces is the main
|
||||
surface. The main surface cannot be a sub-surface, because
|
||||
sub-surfaces must always have a parent.
|
||||
|
||||
A main surface with its sub-surfaces forms a (compound) window.
|
||||
For window management purposes, this set of wl_surface objects is
|
||||
to be considered as a single window, and it should also behave as
|
||||
such.
|
||||
|
||||
The aim of sub-surfaces is to offload some of the compositing work
|
||||
within a window from clients to the compositor. A prime example is
|
||||
a video player with decorations and video in separate wl_surface
|
||||
objects. This should allow the compositor to pass YUV video buffer
|
||||
processing to dedicated overlay hardware when possible.
|
||||
</description>
|
||||
|
||||
<request name="destroy" type="destructor">
|
||||
<description summary="unbind from the subcompositor interface">
|
||||
Informs the server that the client will not be using this
|
||||
protocol object anymore. This does not affect any other
|
||||
objects, wl_subsurface objects included.
|
||||
</description>
|
||||
</request>
|
||||
|
||||
<enum name="error">
|
||||
<entry name="bad_surface" value="0"
|
||||
summary="the to-be sub-surface is invalid"/>
|
||||
</enum>
|
||||
|
||||
<request name="get_subsurface">
|
||||
<description summary="give a surface the role sub-surface">
|
||||
Create a sub-surface interface for the given surface, and
|
||||
associate it with the given parent surface. This turns a
|
||||
plain wl_surface into a sub-surface.
|
||||
|
||||
The to-be sub-surface must not already have a dedicated
|
||||
purpose, like any shell surface type, cursor image, drag icon,
|
||||
or sub-surface. Otherwise a protocol error is raised.
|
||||
</description>
|
||||
|
||||
<arg name="id" type="new_id" interface="wl_subsurface"
|
||||
summary="the new subsurface object id"/>
|
||||
<arg name="surface" type="object" interface="wl_surface"
|
||||
summary="the surface to be turned into a sub-surface"/>
|
||||
<arg name="parent" type="object" interface="wl_surface"
|
||||
summary="the parent surface"/>
|
||||
</request>
|
||||
</interface>
|
||||
|
||||
<interface name="wl_subsurface" version="1">
|
||||
<description summary="sub-surface interface to a wl_surface">
|
||||
An additional interface to a wl_surface object, which has been
|
||||
made a sub-surface. A sub-surface has one parent surface. A
|
||||
sub-surface's size and position are not limited to that of the parent.
|
||||
Particularly, a sub-surface is not automatically clipped to its
|
||||
parent's area.
|
||||
|
||||
A sub-surface becomes mapped, when a non-NULL wl_buffer is applied
|
||||
and the parent surface is mapped. The order of which one happens
|
||||
first is irrelevant. A sub-surface is hidden if the parent becomes
|
||||
hidden, or if a NULL wl_buffer is applied. These rules apply
|
||||
recursively through the tree of surfaces.
|
||||
|
||||
The behaviour of wl_surface.commit request on a sub-surface
|
||||
depends on the sub-surface's mode. The possible modes are
|
||||
synchronized and desynchronized, see methods
|
||||
wl_subsurface.set_sync and wl_subsurface.set_desync. Synchronized
|
||||
mode caches the wl_surface state to be applied when the parent's
|
||||
state gets applied, and desynchronized mode applies the pending
|
||||
wl_surface state directly. A sub-surface is initially in the
|
||||
synchronized mode.
|
||||
|
||||
Sub-surfaces have also other kind of state, which is managed by
|
||||
wl_subsurface requests, as opposed to wl_surface requests. This
|
||||
state includes the sub-surface position relative to the parent
|
||||
surface (wl_subsurface.set_position), and the stacking order of
|
||||
the parent and its sub-surfaces (wl_subsurface.place_above and
|
||||
.place_below). This state is applied when the parent surface's
|
||||
wl_surface state is applied, regardless of the sub-surface's mode.
|
||||
As the exception, set_sync and set_desync are effective immediately.
|
||||
|
||||
The main surface can be thought to be always in desynchronized mode,
|
||||
since it does not have a parent in the sub-surfaces sense.
|
||||
|
||||
Even if a sub-surface is in desynchronized mode, it will behave as
|
||||
in synchronized mode, if its parent surface behaves as in
|
||||
synchronized mode. This rule is applied recursively throughout the
|
||||
tree of surfaces. This means, that one can set a sub-surface into
|
||||
synchronized mode, and then assume that all its child and grand-child
|
||||
sub-surfaces are synchronized, too, without explicitly setting them.
|
||||
|
||||
If the wl_surface associated with the wl_subsurface is destroyed, the
|
||||
wl_subsurface object becomes inert. Note, that destroying either object
|
||||
takes effect immediately. If you need to synchronize the removal
|
||||
of a sub-surface to the parent surface update, unmap the sub-surface
|
||||
first by attaching a NULL wl_buffer, update parent, and then destroy
|
||||
the sub-surface.
|
||||
|
||||
If the parent wl_surface object is destroyed, the sub-surface is
|
||||
unmapped.
|
||||
</description>
|
||||
|
||||
<request name="destroy" type="destructor">
|
||||
<description summary="remove sub-surface interface">
|
||||
The sub-surface interface is removed from the wl_surface object
|
||||
that was turned into a sub-surface with
|
||||
wl_subcompositor.get_subsurface request. The wl_surface's association
|
||||
to the parent is deleted, and the wl_surface loses its role as
|
||||
a sub-surface. The wl_surface is unmapped.
|
||||
</description>
|
||||
</request>
|
||||
|
||||
<enum name="error">
|
||||
<entry name="bad_surface" value="0"
|
||||
summary="wl_surface is not a sibling or the parent"/>
|
||||
</enum>
|
||||
|
||||
<request name="set_position">
|
||||
<description summary="reposition the sub-surface">
|
||||
This schedules a sub-surface position change.
|
||||
The sub-surface will be moved so, that its origin (top-left
|
||||
corner pixel) will be at the location x, y of the parent surface
|
||||
coordinate system. The coordinates are not restricted to the parent
|
||||
surface area. Negative values are allowed.
|
||||
|
||||
The next wl_surface.commit on the parent surface will reset
|
||||
the sub-surface's position to the scheduled coordinates.
|
||||
|
||||
The initial position is 0, 0.
|
||||
</description>
|
||||
|
||||
<arg name="x" type="int" summary="coordinate in the parent surface"/>
|
||||
<arg name="y" type="int" summary="coordinate in the parent surface"/>
|
||||
</request>
|
||||
|
||||
<request name="place_above">
|
||||
<description summary="restack the sub-surface">
|
||||
This sub-surface is taken from the stack, and put back just
|
||||
above the reference surface, changing the z-order of the sub-surfaces.
|
||||
The reference surface must be one of the sibling surfaces, or the
|
||||
parent surface. Using any other surface, including this sub-surface,
|
||||
will cause a protocol error.
|
||||
|
||||
The z-order is double-buffered state, and will be applied on the
|
||||
next commit of the parent surface.
|
||||
See wl_surface.commit and wl_subcompositor.get_subsurface.
|
||||
|
||||
A new sub-surface is initially added as the top-most in the stack
|
||||
of its siblings and parent.
|
||||
</description>
|
||||
|
||||
<arg name="sibling" type="object" interface="wl_surface"
|
||||
summary="the reference surface"/>
|
||||
</request>
|
||||
|
||||
<request name="place_below">
|
||||
<description summary="restack the sub-surface">
|
||||
The sub-surface is placed just below of the reference surface.
|
||||
See wl_subsurface.place_above.
|
||||
</description>
|
||||
|
||||
<arg name="sibling" type="object" interface="wl_surface"
|
||||
summary="the reference surface"/>
|
||||
</request>
|
||||
|
||||
<request name="set_sync">
|
||||
<description summary="set sub-surface to synchronized mode">
|
||||
Change the commit behaviour of the sub-surface to synchronized
|
||||
mode, also described as the parent dependant mode.
|
||||
|
||||
In synchronized mode, wl_surface.commit on a sub-surface will
|
||||
accumulate the committed state in a cache, but the state will
|
||||
not be applied and hence will not change the compositor output.
|
||||
The cached state is applied to the sub-surface immediately after
|
||||
the parent surface's state is applied. This ensures atomic
|
||||
updates of the parent and all its synchronized sub-surfaces.
|
||||
Applying the cached state will invalidate the cache, so further
|
||||
parent surface commits do not (re-)apply old state.
|
||||
|
||||
See wl_subsurface for the recursive effect of this mode.
|
||||
</description>
|
||||
</request>
|
||||
|
||||
<request name="set_desync">
|
||||
<description summary="set sub-surface to desynchronized mode">
|
||||
Change the commit behaviour of the sub-surface to desynchronized
|
||||
mode, also described as independent or freely running mode.
|
||||
|
||||
In desynchronized mode, wl_surface.commit on a sub-surface will
|
||||
apply the pending state directly, without caching, as happens
|
||||
normally with a wl_surface. Calling wl_surface.commit on the
|
||||
parent surface has no effect on the sub-surface's wl_surface
|
||||
state. This mode allows a sub-surface to be updated on its own.
|
||||
|
||||
If cached state exists when wl_surface.commit is called in
|
||||
desynchronized mode, the pending state is added to the cached
|
||||
state, and applied as whole. This invalidates the cache.
|
||||
|
||||
Note: even if a sub-surface is set to desynchronized, a parent
|
||||
sub-surface may override it to behave as synchronized. For details,
|
||||
see wl_subsurface.
|
||||
|
||||
If a surface's parent surface behaves as desynchronized, then
|
||||
the cached state is applied on set_desync.
|
||||
</description>
|
||||
</request>
|
||||
|
||||
</interface>
|
||||
|
||||
</protocol>
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue