Fix missing argument to pa_read(), and be consistent with declaration of
state variable in pa_cpu_init_arm().
Signed-off-by: Daniel T Chen <crimsun@ubuntu.com>
pulsecore/cpu-arm.c: In function 'get_cpuinfo':
pulsecore/cpu-arm.c:70: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pa_read' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
pulsecore/cpu-arm.c:72: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pa_close' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
pulsecore/cpu-arm.c: In function 'pa_cpu_init_arm':
pulsecore/cpu-arm.c:110: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pa_split_spaces' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
pulsecore/cpu-arm.c:110: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast
Function `pa_split_spaces' implicitly converted to pointer at pulsecore/cpu-arm.c:110
Signed-off-by: Daniel T Chen <crimsun@ubuntu.com>
At least for pipes, recv() with MSG_PEEK does actually eat up data from
file descriptors. Hence, this can't be used for PULLHUP emulation.
Use another ioctl hack for that.
Even on 10.5.8, poll() does not do the right thing. Haven't checked on
newer versions. Hence, wrap all occurences of poll() to pa_poll and
emulate that call with select() on OSX. This is totally embarassing.
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 11:57:04PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 16.09.09 15:15, Daniel Mack (daniel@caiaq.de) wrote:
>
> > + s = pa_xnew(pa_semaphore, 1);
> > + MPCreateSemaphore(UINT_MAX, value, &(s->sema));
> > + pa_assert(s->sema != 0);
>
> Hmm, I'd prefer if the ret val of MPCreateSemaphore() would be checked
> here.
>
> Also I find it a bit weird checking for s->sema, though not
> initializing it to 0 in the beginning. If the call actually failed,
> then the assert will check uninitialized memory. Also, comparing
> pointers with 0 sucks. That should be NULL.
>
> Given that this can not realisitically fail, only in OOM or OOM-like
> situations in which case we abort anyway it mght be enough just writing:
>
> pa_assert_se(MPCreateSemaphore(UINT_MAX, value, &s->sema) == 0);
>
> (Assuming that success is signalled by retval == 0 on MacOSX)
>
> > +void pa_semaphore_free(pa_semaphore *s) {
> > + pa_assert(s);
> > + MPDeleteSemaphore(s->sema);
>
> Same here.
>
> > + pa_xfree(s);
> > +}
> > +
> > +void pa_semaphore_post(pa_semaphore *s) {
> > + pa_assert(s);
> > + MPSignalSemaphore(s->sema);
>
> And here.
>
> > +}
> > +
> > +void pa_semaphore_wait(pa_semaphore *s) {
> > + pa_assert(s);
> > + /* should probably check return value (-ve is error), noErr is ok. */
> > + MPWaitOnSemaphore(s->sema, kDurationForever);
>
> And here.
Ok, done. See the patch below.
Daniel
>From 26df2fbae6d9215a3ae084876fb5f79e4d9cf4f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kim Lester <kim@dfusion.com.au>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:23:39 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] Mac OS X: add semaphore implementation
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 11:48:58PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 16.09.09 15:15, Daniel Mack (daniel@caiaq.de) wrote:
>
> > From: Kim Lester <kim@dfusion.com.au>
> >
> > OS X does not define clockid_t or clock_gettime() and friends.
> > Add a wrapper to fix this.
>
> Hmpf. I am not particularly happy with this. This adds a lot of
> unnecessary compat code. We don't actually need implementations of
> clock_getres(). All we need is some kind of check whether system
> timers are accurate or whether they are rounded up to scheduling
> slices. On Linux we do that check with clock_getres(), but all the
> information it returns is actually not intertesting at all. We just
> check if this is below some trheshold, that's all.
>
> clock_settime() we don't use at all! We shouldn't carry compat code
> for that.
>
> And clock_gettime we don't really need either. We need some kind of
> accurate system timers (preferably monotonic), and on Linux we use
> clock_gettime() for that. But we already have a fallback there for
> gettimeofday().
>
> Or in other words, the current APIs pa_rtclock_get(),
> pa_rtclock_hrtimer() is supposed to be the abstract API that has
> different backends on different systems. I'd very much prefer if any
> MacOS specific code would simply be plugged in there instead of
> creating various new abstraction interfaces!
Ok - what about the version below? I don't particularily like the
Daniel
>From 9f0a051953ec354ccdb8aa44a9845c408b26ae0b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kim Lester <kim@dfusion.com.au>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:40:01 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] Implement pa_rtclock_get() and pa_rtclock_hrtimer() for Darwin
OS X does not define clockid_t or clock_gettime() and friends.
Add wrappers to fix this. Based on a patch from Kim Lester
<kim@dfusion.com.au>.
Tweak the constraints a little so that register starved 32bit systems
can select a stack variable for the channel paramter instead of reusing one of
the registers we're using in the code.
