From 80c732e4c100985c5b36e0bbd81b9ee1ecac11d4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arun Raghavan <arun@arunraghavan.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 15:21:20 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] memblockq-test: Rename test to something more relevant

We now have a separate test for _pop_missing().
---
 src/tests/memblockq-test.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/tests/memblockq-test.c b/src/tests/memblockq-test.c
index 3673f84b6..1404c7890 100644
--- a/src/tests/memblockq-test.c
+++ b/src/tests/memblockq-test.c
@@ -518,7 +518,7 @@ START_TEST (memblockq_test_pop_missing) {
 }
 END_TEST
 
-START_TEST (pop_missing_test) {
+START_TEST (memblockq_test_tlength_change) {
     int ret;
     size_t missing;
 
@@ -614,7 +614,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
     tcase_add_test(tc, memblockq_test);
     tcase_add_test(tc, memblockq_test_length_changes);
     tcase_add_test(tc, memblockq_test_pop_missing);
-    tcase_add_test(tc, pop_missing_test);
+    tcase_add_test(tc, memblockq_test_tlength_change);
     suite_add_tcase(s, tc);
 
     sr = srunner_create(s);