From 12a202c510dcacbd2b85fcc1170484eb16fef491 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Arun Raghavan Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 09:27:56 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] format: Make pa_format_info_valid() stricter for PCM We should do stricter validation when we can. --- src/pulse/format.c | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/pulse/format.c b/src/pulse/format.c index c2a1552d1..b07940ae7 100644 --- a/src/pulse/format.c +++ b/src/pulse/format.c @@ -101,7 +101,13 @@ void pa_format_info_free(pa_format_info *f) { } int pa_format_info_valid(const pa_format_info *f) { - return (f->encoding >= 0 && f->encoding < PA_ENCODING_MAX && f->plist != NULL); + pa_sample_spec ss; + + if (pa_format_info_is_pcm(f)) { + pa_format_info_to_sample_spec(f, &ss, NULL); + return pa_sample_spec_valid(&ss); + } else + return (f->encoding >= 0 && f->encoding < PA_ENCODING_MAX && f->plist != NULL); } int pa_format_info_is_pcm(const pa_format_info *f) {