From 094906b3f9de5d2fda1e61e5aeec23fecf34efd4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Martin Blanchard Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2016 12:54:08 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] raop: Prefer ALAC encoding to raw PCM if supported by server ALAC encoding is to be prefered simply because ALAC audio packet reverse- engineering and implementation is in better shape than raw PCM. Sending ALAC audio does not mean compressing audio and thus linking an external library to do so. ALAC packets has the ability to carry uncompressed PCM frames, and that's what is implemented at the time. --- src/modules/raop/module-raop-discover.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/modules/raop/module-raop-discover.c b/src/modules/raop/module-raop-discover.c index 6e2542a0d..bf05dec26 100644 --- a/src/modules/raop/module-raop-discover.c +++ b/src/modules/raop/module-raop-discover.c @@ -200,7 +200,10 @@ static void resolver_cb( * - 1 = ALAC, * - 2 = AAC, * - 3 = AAC ELD. */ - cn = pa_xstrdup("PCM"); + if (pa_str_in_list(value, ",", "1")) + cn = pa_xstrdup("ALAC"); + else + cn = pa_xstrdup("PCM"); } else if (pa_streq(key, "md")) { /* Supported metadata types: * - 0 = text,