From 056bb3a39c166265e04286d03c906857bc1ad4a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tanu Kaskinen Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 08:09:36 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] sink-input: Fix comment: s/push/peek/ --- src/pulsecore/sink-input.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/pulsecore/sink-input.c b/src/pulsecore/sink-input.c index f6f93b883..d9fd35b9a 100644 --- a/src/pulsecore/sink-input.c +++ b/src/pulsecore/sink-input.c @@ -989,7 +989,7 @@ void pa_sink_input_process_rewind(pa_sink_input *i, size_t nbytes /* in sink sam if (i->thread_info.rewrite_nbytes == (size_t) -1) { /* We were asked to drop all buffered data, and rerequest new - * data from implementor the next time push() is called */ + * data from implementor the next time peek() is called */ pa_memblockq_flush_write(i->thread_info.render_memblockq, TRUE);