mirror of
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/pipewire/pipewire.git
synced 2025-10-31 22:25:38 -04:00
bluez5: correct parsing order for HF indicator 2 based battery status
Since "AT+BIND=" was before "AT+BIND=?", the seconds statement was never matched.
This commit is contained in:
parent
eff67c3c03
commit
a1777d00e3
1 changed files with 7 additions and 7 deletions
|
|
@ -813,17 +813,17 @@ static bool rfcomm_hfp_ag(struct spa_source *source, char* buf)
|
|||
spa_log_debug(backend->log, NAME": RFCOMM receive unsupported VGS gain: %s", buf);
|
||||
rfcomm_send_reply(rfcomm, "ERROR");
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else if (strncmp(buf, "AT+BIND=", 8) == 0) {
|
||||
// BIND=... should return a comma separated list of indicators and
|
||||
// 2 should be among the other numbers telling that battery charge
|
||||
// is supported
|
||||
rfcomm_send_reply(rfcomm, "OK");
|
||||
} else if (strncmp(buf, "AT+BIND=?", 9) == 0) {
|
||||
} else if (spa_strstartswith(buf, "AT+BIND=?")) {
|
||||
rfcomm_send_reply(rfcomm, "+BIND: (2)");
|
||||
rfcomm_send_reply(rfcomm, "OK");
|
||||
} else if (strncmp(buf, "AT+BIND?", 8) == 0) {
|
||||
} else if (spa_strstartswith(buf, "AT+BIND?")) {
|
||||
rfcomm_send_reply(rfcomm, "+BIND: 2,1");
|
||||
rfcomm_send_reply(rfcomm, "OK");
|
||||
} else if (spa_strstartswith(buf, "AT+BIND=")) {
|
||||
// BIND=... should return a comma separated list of indicators and
|
||||
// 2 should be among the other numbers telling that battery charge
|
||||
// is supported
|
||||
rfcomm_send_reply(rfcomm, "OK");
|
||||
} else if (sscanf(buf, "AT+BIEV=%u,%u", &indicator, &indicator_value) == 2) {
|
||||
if (indicator == SPA_BT_HFP_HF_INDICATOR_BATTERY_LEVEL) {
|
||||
// Battery level is reported in range 0-100
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue