From 77a51002804ed2281f9d116979d5858f7f3eee37 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Robert Mader <robert.mader@collabora.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 16:22:52 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] gst: Use gst_util_uint64_scale instead of scale_int

GST_SECOND * t.rate.num can turn into a negative gint, resulting in
assertions like:
_gst_util_uint64_scale_int: assertion 'num >= 0' failed

Just use the 64bit version instead.
---
 src/gst/gstpipewireclock.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/gst/gstpipewireclock.c b/src/gst/gstpipewireclock.c
index 701bb6ff0..10607c3e7 100644
--- a/src/gst/gstpipewireclock.c
+++ b/src/gst/gstpipewireclock.c
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ gst_pipewire_clock_get_internal_time (GstClock * clock)
       t.rate.denom == 0)
     return pclock->last_time;
 
-  result = gst_util_uint64_scale_int (t.ticks, GST_SECOND * t.rate.num, t.rate.denom);
+  result = gst_util_uint64_scale (t.ticks, GST_SECOND * t.rate.num, t.rate.denom);
   result += now - t.now;
 
   result += pclock->time_offset;