Foot previously responded with window local coordinates.
But, XTerm responds with screen *absolute* coordinates. This isn’t
possible under Wayland, thus we now report (0,0) instead. Same as we
do for ‘CSI 13 ; 0 t’.
It’s ok to let the receiving end handle formatting C0 control
characters in bracketed paste mode.
In fact, we *must* let them through. Otherwise it is impossible to
paste e.g. tabs into editors and similar applications.
It’s ok to let the receiving end handle formatting C0 control
characters in bracketed paste mode.
In fact, we *must* let them through. Otherwise it is impossible to
paste e.g. tabs into editors and similar applications.
To reproduce issue:
- Launch an IME from inside foot
- Type in some preedit text
- Use Ctrl-C to close the IME
- IME text stays in terminal until focus is changed
To reproduce issue:
- Launch an IME from inside foot
- Type in some preedit text
- Use Ctrl-C to close the IME
- IME text stays in terminal until focus is changed
We failed to convert the byte-indices to cell indices, resulting in a
box cursor covering the entire pre-edit string.
Note that in addition to fixing the translation from byte index to
cell index, the rendered had to be updated to dirty one extra cell
from the original grid.
Without this, we left trailing cursors behind us when the user deleted
text from the pre-edit string.
When rendering the search input box, do the same ad-hoc workaround for
combining characters with a positive x-offset as we do when rendering
normal grid cells.
In this case, we don’t *know* when we’re dealing with combining
characters. But we can detect zero-width characters. For these, check
their glyph’s x-offset. If positive, adjust it like we do when
rendering combining glyphs in the main grid, to ensure the glyph is
positioned over the _previous_ character, not the next.
These two buttons were encoded using the *exact* same numbers as
button 4 and 5 (scroll wheel up/down), making it impossible to
distinguish them.
The relevant section from XTerm’s control sequences documentation is:
Some wheel mice can send additional button events, e.g., by tilting the
scroll wheel left and right.
Additional buttons are encoded like the wheel mice,
o by adding 64 (for buttons 6 and 7), or
o by adding 128 (for buttons 8 through 11).
We failed to convert the byte-indices to cell indices, resulting in a
box cursor covering the entire pre-edit string.
Note that in addition to fixing the translation from byte index to
cell index, the rendered had to be updated to dirty one extra cell
from the original grid.
Without this, we left trailing cursors behind us when the user deleted
text from the pre-edit string.
When rendering the search input box, do the same ad-hoc workaround for
combining characters with a positive x-offset as we do when rendering
normal grid cells.
In this case, we don’t *know* when we’re dealing with combining
characters. But we can detect zero-width characters. For these, check
their glyph’s x-offset. If positive, adjust it like we do when
rendering combining glyphs in the main grid, to ensure the glyph is
positioned over the _previous_ character, not the next.
These two buttons were encoded using the *exact* same numbers as
button 4 and 5 (scroll wheel up/down), making it impossible to
distinguish them.
The relevant section from XTerm’s control sequences documentation is:
Some wheel mice can send additional button events, e.g., by tilting the
scroll wheel left and right.
Additional buttons are encoded like the wheel mice,
o by adding 64 (for buttons 6 and 7), or
o by adding 128 (for buttons 8 through 11).
wayland-client-protocol.h:
Negative values for either rate or delay are illegal. A rate of
zero will disable any repeating (regardless of the value of
delay).
This fixes a division-by-zero crash.
