csi: secondary DA: fix comment; we don't use an XTerm version number

This commit is contained in:
Daniel Eklöf 2025-12-28 11:37:54 +01:00
parent 53e8fbbdec
commit 42e04c5c87
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 5BBD4992C116573F

8
csi.c
View file

@ -1644,10 +1644,10 @@ csi_dispatch(struct terminal *term, uint8_t final)
* 64 - vt520 * 64 - vt520
* 65 - vt525 * 65 - vt525
* *
* Param 2 - firmware version * Param 2 - firmware version xterm uses its version
* xterm uses its version number. We use an xterm * number. We do to, in the format "MAJORMINORPATCH",
* version number too, since e.g. Emacs uses this to * where all three version numbers are always two
* determine level of support. * digits. So e.g. 1.25.0 is reported as 012500.
* *
* We report ourselves as a VT220. This must be * We report ourselves as a VT220. This must be
* synchronized with the primary DA response. * synchronized with the primary DA response.